One process for a landing page, a corporate site, an MVP and business automation. The depth of each stage changes, not the logic: understand the job, build, launch, measure.
We do not sell a “website in 7 days” or draw a mockup before it is clear what should happen after launch. Timeline and price appear after the job — not from a homepage rate card.
6
development stages
From brief to production, no hidden “we’ll think later”
1
team on the project
UX, design and development with no vendor relay
First
the job, then the estimate
Cost follows the work, not the other way around
Builds
along the way, not at the end
You can open an intermediate result and correct it
Formats
Landing pages, products and automation follow the same logic. The difference is research depth, number of states and integrations.
A landing page or a corporate site: offer, structure, leads and SEO. Same stages, shorter research, fewer states.
About this serviceOne core flow on a production stack. Deeper UX for roles and empty states — the job first, then development.
About this servicen8n, AI for business or a Telegram bot. Process map first, then the scenario — not “let’s drop some nodes”.
About this serviceStages
This is how we build a website, a web app and an automation scenario. Each step has a result you can open and discuss — not a surprise at the end.
A short pass on the job: goal, audience, constraints, what already exists. After the brief we know if this is a landing page, a corporate site, an MVP or automation — and whether we take it.
Stage result:A clear project type and the questions we cannot estimate without.
Demand, flows and the size of v1. We lock what is in this website or product build and what is the next stage. This is where the estimate appears, not a “from zero” range.
Stage result:A clear v1 job, the work list and an estimate. You can go to UX or stop.
The skeleton of pages or product: user path, forms, roles, empty states, SEO tree for a site. Design and code hang on this, not the other way around.
Stage result:An agreed structure: routes, blocks, key flows.
An interface in a system you can grow. Not pretty screens in a vacuum and not a “unique style” that breaks on page two.
Stage result:Design in the same logic the build will follow.
Code, integrations, SEO markup, access. Intermediate builds, not a big reveal. For automation — a working scenario on your data, not a slide.
Stage result:A working build you can open, click and correct.
Deploy, analytics, forms and indexing. For a product — access and monitoring. Then support or the next iteration, not “we’re done, good luck”.
Stage result:Production, a clear next step and who owns it after release.
We do not start “drawing a website” until the job and the success signal are clear. Otherwise you get a mockup, not a tool.
UX, design and development are not handed down a chain of vendors. Fewer losses at the seams and less “someone else built that”.
We do not promise a “website in 7 days”. A date appears after the work is scoped. If the job is not ours, we say so at the brief.
It is more honest to decline at the brief than to ship “another website” nobody needed.
With no job, offer or audience we do not draw a storefront. That is not about taste — there is nothing to measure.
Building a Figma file with no UX mandate usually breaks on responsive and states. Better to rebuild the structure.
We do not sell “we’ll get you to #1”. We do SEO structure. We do not promise traffic. That is more honest than any guarantee.
If the job already exists — we unpack it, not a package from a price list
A short brief: goal, audience, what already exists. After it we know if this is a site, a product or automation — and whether to start at all.
Инструмент для водителей такси — карты, зоны, спрос и оценка заказов.
Explore case
Админ-панель для Yard — зоны, водители, спрос и операционное управление.
Explore case
Платформа аналитики и управления для контент-заводов и UGC-creators.
Explore case
SEO Starter — веб-сервис, который превращает поисковый спрос в готовую структуру сайта.
Explore caseSix stages: brief, the job and estimate, UX, design, development with builds, and launch. A landing page is shorter; a corporate site has more structure and SEO. The timeline appears after the work is scoped, not from a slogan.
It depends on scope: one offer page with a form is not a dashboard with roles. We do not write “website in 7 days”. After the brief we lock the job and the date that follows from it.
No. If a spec exists, we review it. If not, we shape the job together. “Just make it pretty” is not a brief we take: without a job we cannot estimate a site or an MVP.
Yes. We keep URLs, blocks and analytics ready so a corporate section does not mean rewriting everything. That is the usual path when you need a launch, not a portal.
Same logic, deeper UX: roles, empty states, one core flow. A site sells and collects a lead. An MVP has to complete a user action in the product. The estimate still comes after the v1 job.
Process map first: where the manual work is, which tools you already have, what should happen on its own. Then n8n, a bot or an AI scenario. We do not start with “let’s plug in a model”.
The offer, the audience, access to materials and someone who can decide. We do not replace your business expertise or invent your market.
After the job: what is in v1, which integrations and content. We do not publish “from $X” ranges — they create false expectations. More on the pricing page.
